EDS 103 Theories of Learning – Reflection for Asst 1
When my eldest daughter was in high school, she excelled in her subjects except in anything that has something to do with Math. She studied in a school that specializes in Science and Mathematics. Often, teachers would say that you cannot be successful in your studies if you’re not good in Math. With the help of a tutor she survived her math challenge. She would have hated that school if not for her Social Studies teacher who commended her excellent thesis defense. She graduated from that school and moved on to college. She became the debate team captain, competed in national debate competitions, completed her Bachelor of Laws and passed the bar exam in 2016 in her first take. My 2nd daughter was just an average student but definitely better than my eldest in Math. She also graduated from the same high school. She is the “madiskarte” type. She studied Occupational Therapy in college. She gets average grades in theory but excel in practical application and was given a clinical proficiency award. She passed her OT board exam in 2017 and currently in medical school. My 3rd daughter excel in all her subjects. She has excellent grades in math and wins national math competitions. One thing though, she’s not a fluent speaker. She’s now in college and still tops the director’s list. My son, is an average student but gets high grades because he really studies hard. One ability that he is proud of is that he is good in arts particularly drawing and painting. He is still in high school and yearly gets in the director’s list. I see my children as different phenotypic expressions of intelligence genes. They have the same genetic materials, they were raised in the same environment, basically eat the same food but what could have influenced their different ability traits. I believed that there is a general intelligence gene but regulated by an internal genetic switch that turns on or off specific ability genes. So, it seems that Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence Theory may not be contradictory to Spearman’s General Intelligence Theory rather an extension of it. I used to worry a lot when they were young. As a young mother then, I did my best to help them in school. I personally teach them aside from enrolling them in tutorial school. My aunt who was a school teacher noticed that I was putting too much pressure on my children. She said that I should loosen up and let my children enjoy learning and discover the things they are good at on their own. I discovered that my children have different learning style. My eldest learns by gathering information first before gaining knowledge. She has a natural ability for evidence gathering and critical thinking. She learns well by inductive reasoning. That’s probably one of the reasons why she succeeded in her chosen profession. My 2nd daughter is more of a deductive learner. Like, “here is the knowledge; go and practice it”. She learns all the theories and principles and applies it perfectly. When under time constraint, I observed that she strategized her learning to pass her tests. Strategic learning may not be bad at all. My 3rd daughter is more of a deductive learner. She is also an abstract learner. She uses her imagination and establish patterns. She abstracts from the examples. My son is more of a deductive and visual learner. He learns and understands better and retains information better when ideas, words and concepts are associated with images.
What I have realized is that in learning, what you see as obvious in your students may not always be true. It is very important to know each and everyone of them. Intelligence and abilities have varied expressions and learners have different learning styles. To these concerns that education theories become valuable. They can provide guidance to both teachers and parents in dealing with these learning variations. As teachers we must be able to recognize these differences so we can adjust our teaching methods to help them achieve their learning goals. Most importantly, teachers should be the source of inspiration not discouragement.
“Children need models rather than critics.” — Joseph Joubert, French moralist